Run-on and Fragment Sentences: An Error Analysis in Indonesian English Learners' Writings

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 13, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/vj.11.2.132-139.2022
Keywords:
English essays, Indonesian English learner, fragment, run-on, sentence completeness

Main Article Content

Shilva Lioni
Andalas University
Zulprianto Zulprianto
Andalas University
Dhiant Asri
Andalas University
Iman Sagito
Andalas University
Novia Irene Zendrato
Andalas University

Abstract

Run-on and fragment sentences provide clues as to how English learners understand English sentences and how English learners organize information and shape their essays. This research was based on a group case study of run-on and fragment sentences in English college students’ essays, using an English Sentence Completeness approach to investigate how English college students make an error on making a sentence in their English essays and discusses the further pedagogical implications based on the errors pattern found. English college students were found to do run-on in their sentences more often than fragments. They write more than one subject and one verb in a sentence and significantly forget to limit their sentences. The carelessness in punctuation and a period between sentences make the sentence permitted to “run on†into the next. Besides run-on, fragments were also found in students’ essays: Missing subject and verb conditions are significantly found in the students’ sentences. These findings revealed that English college students lack knowledge of how to make complete sentences in ordering information and building up a text’s structure. Therefore the learning process of English writing should be informed of the importance of English sentence completeness in organizing a text and introduce the strategies for avoiding and making less run-on and fragment sentences through practice activities and writing assignments. This research is qualitative descriptive-explorative research where descriptive and explorative are intended to describe and explain the situation based on collected data and facts, which are then analyzed and arranged systematically to get conclusions in detail to be a hypothesis.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Linguistics
Author Biographies

Shilva Lioni, Andalas University

English Department

Zulprianto Zulprianto, Andalas University

English Department

Dhiant Asri, Andalas University

English Department

Iman Sagito, Andalas University

English Department

Novia Irene Zendrato, Andalas University

English Department

References

Alonso, S., & McCabe, A. (2003). Improving text flow in ESL learner compositions. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/ Alonso-ImprovingFlow.html.

Altenberg, B., & Tapper, M. (1998). The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer. London & New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.

Belmonte, I. A., & McCabe-Hidalgo, A. (1998). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. Didáctica, 10, 13-31.

Berry, M. (1995). Thematic options and success in writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter.

B. Simandjuntak, & IL. Pasaribu. (1981). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: Tarsito.

Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 50-117.

Brown, R. (1957). Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 55, 1-5.

Cai, J. T. (1998). The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on Chinese EFL learners’ compositions. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 17-21.

Christie, F., & Dreyfus, S. (2007). Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 235-247.

C. George Boeree. (2005). Sejarah Psikologi dari Masa Kelahiran Sampai Masa Modern. Yogyakarta; Prisma Sophie.

Dale , P.S. (1976). Language development: Structure and function (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Dimyati & Mujiono. (1994). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta; Rineka Cipta.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012). Factuality in undergraduate students’ writings. International Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 137-144.

Fries, P. H. (1995). Themes, methods of development, and texts In R. Hasan, & P. H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gibson, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Science, 148, 1066-1072.

Gibson, E. J. & Levin, H. (1975). The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, Mass: The M.I.T. Press.

Grabe, M. D. (1978). Processing of visual and name codes in good and poor readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 69-76.

G. Grandy. (2010). Intrinsic Case Study. In Albert J. Mills, G. Durepos & E. Wiebe, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. California, USA: SAGE Publications.

Granger, S. (2009). The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Hergenhanh, B.R., & H Olson Matthew. (1997). An Introduction to Theories of Learning: Fifth Edition. New York: Prentice Hall.

Kagan, Dona M. (1980). Run-on and Fragment Sentences: An Error Analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 14(2), 127-138. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170846

Mason, M. (1975). Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 146-166.

Muhammad Hifdil Islam. (2015). Thorndike Theory and It’s Application in Learning. At- Ta’lim : Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 37-47. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unzah.ac.id/index.php/attalim/article/view/166

Narita, M., & Sugiura, M. (2006). The use of adverbial connectors in argumentative essays by Japanese EFL college students. English Corpus Studies, 13, 23-42.

Oemar Hamalik. (2000). Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Otto, J. (1977). Reading cue utilization by low-achieving college freshmen. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 71-84.

Steinheiser, R., & Guthrie, J. T. (1977). Perceptual and linguistic processing of letters and words by normal and disabled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 217-225.

Sumadi Suryabrata. (1987). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Thorndike, Edward L. (1903). Educational Psychology. Montana, Amerika: Kessinger Publishing, LLC.

Warriner, John E. (1988). English Composition and Grammar. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.

Wei, Jing. (2016). Thematic Choice in Chinese College Students’ English Essays. English for Specific Purposes, 41, 50-67. Retrieved from ciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889490615000599

Zutell, J. (1978). Some psycholinguistic perspectives on children’s spelling. Language Arts, 55, 844-850.