Women Language Features in Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar Named Desire

Main Article Content

Iga Rahadiyanti

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to observe the types of women language features and the most frequent women language feature used by the main women characters in the dialogue of Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar Named Desire play. Ten women language features proposed by Robin Lakoff is used to analyze the data. This study only observes eight out of ten women language features proposed by Robin Lakoff, namely tag question, intensifier, hypercorrect grammar, hedges or fillers, empty adjectives, precise color terms, super polite form, and avoidance of strong swear words. This study excludes emphatic stress and rising intonation on declaratives feature. Due to the absence of any numeric data, this study uses descriptive qualitative approach. The data is taken from written script of the play which consists of eleven scenes. Seven women language features found namely lexical hedges or fillers, tag question, intensifier, empty adjectives, superpolite form, avoidance of strong swear words, and precise color terms. The most frequent feature is lexical hedges or fillers (59.49%) while no hypercorrect grammar is found. This study supports Lakoff theory since most of the features are found in the conversation of main women characters

Article Details

Section
Linguistics
Author Biography

Iga Rahadiyanti, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

Ilmu Linguistik Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Airlangga

References

Acker, J. (1992). Gendered Institutions: From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. In Contemporary Sociology, Vol.21, No.5 (Sep, 1992), pp.565-569.

Cameron, D. (1987). Lakoff in Context: The Social and Linguistic Functions of Tag Questions. In Women Language: Critical Approaches (pp.74-93).

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. UK:

Cambridge University Press.

Haas, A. (1979). Male and Female Spoken Language Differences: Stereotypes and Evidence. In Psychological Bulletin Vol 86, No.3, (pp.615-626).State University of New York College at New Paltz.

Hensley, A. (2009). 10 Big Differences between Men’s and Women’s Brains in Masters of Healthcare. Retrieved from http://www.mastersofhealthcare.com/blog/2009/10-big-differences-between-mens-and-womens-brains/

Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Third Edition. London: Longman.

Kartika, F.N. (2015). Women Language Features Used by Oprah Winfrey in Same-Sex and Cross-Sex Communication. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman's Place. In Language in Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, (pp. 45-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707.

Lambertz, K, and Melanie Hebrok. (2011). Women’s Language in Soap Operas: Comparing Features of Female Speech in Australia and Germany in Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, (pp.39-54). Griffith University Brisbane, Australia.

Mulyaningtyas. (2004). A Study of Women Linguistic Features Found in The Dialogue of Gilmore Girls TV Series. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Pebrianti, A.A. (2013). Women’s Language Features Used by Indonesian Female Bloggers. Bandung: University of Education.

Rosita, D. (2008). An analysis of Sex and the City Dialogue Based on Ten Types of Women’s Linguistics Features. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Savitri, R.D. (2011). An Analysis of Women Linguistics Features in Legally Blonde I. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.