The Multifunctionality of a Morpheme Proposes its Morphosyntactic Features and their Specifications: Feature Matrix

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/vj.9.2.66-79.2020
Keywords:
Arabic, feature matrix, multifunctionality, restrictedness, specifications

Main Article Content

Mohammad Ali Al Zahrani
Taif University

Abstract

Multifunctionality is a cross linguistic phenomenon. It refers to the linguistic capability of a linguistic form to manifest itself in different syntactic structures that result in different syntactic functions. Treating multifunctionality from a generative perspective, the paper focuses on the different functions of the Hijazi Arabic (HA) maa and contributes to the HA literature by describing these different functions and claiming that they are not instances of homonymy, but of multifunctionality. Those different functions are governed by the different syntactic environments that maa occurs in. Its occurrence in multiple syntactic environments suggests that maa has a feature matrix that includes its morphosyntactic features and their specifications that express the appropriate use and interpretation of a given structure. The findings show that maa may function as a negative particle, emphatic particle, relative pronoun, infinitival particle, conditional particle, interrogative particle, exclamative particle and a particle of inclusion. These uses differ in their syntactic flexibility and rigidity (restrictedness). Although more than one function can incorporate to express multiple senses, the salient point about the different functions of maa is that there is no semantic or syntactic ambiguity between its functions.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020)
Section
Linguistics
Author Biography

Mohammad Ali Al Zahrani, Taif University

Mohammad Al Zahrani, an Associate Professor & a Fellow of Higher Education Academy, UK, holds a PhD & an MA in Linguistics from the University Of Queensland, Australia; a BA in English language, Linguistics and Literature, and a diploma in Education from Umm Al Qura University. He’d been tutoring at the University of Queensland for 3 years, and has been teaching MA and BA students since 2013. He has published around 17 articles since 2014.

References

Abboud, P. F., and McCarus, E. N. (1983). Elementry Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ackema, P., and Neeleman, A. (2004). Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation (Vol. 6): Oxford University Press on Demand.

Al Zahrani, M. (2008). Morphology of negation in Modern Standard Arabic and Spoken Hijazi Arabic. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Al Zahrani, M. (2013). Morphosyntactic and semantic properties of Hijazi Arabic modals. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane,Australia.

Al Zahrani, M. (2014a). ‘Negation in non-verbal clauses: Modern Standard Arabic and Spoken Hijazi Arabic’. Pakistan Journal of Languages and Translation Studies, 2, 31- 49.

Al Zahrani, M. (2014b). ‘The syntactic properties of negatives’. US-China Foreign Language(1), 1 17.

Al Zahrani, M. (2016). ‘Aktionsarten projection and subcategorization’. The Internaional Journal of Arabic Linguistics (IJAL), 2(1), 46-69.

Al Zahrani, M. (2018). ‘Morphosyntactic and semantic properties of epistemic modals modifying verbal clauses. In P. G. Medina, R. T. Alonso & R. V. Escarza (eds.), Verbs, Clauses and Constructions: Functional and Typological Approaches, 149-166. Newcastle: United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Al Zahrani, M. and Alzahrani, S. (2019). ‘Negatives scoping over verbal clauses in some Arabic varieties’. US-China Foreign Language, 17(7), 332-344.

Arnott, D. W. (1970). The Nominal and Verbal System of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ateeq, A. (2009). cilm almacaani [Semantics] (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar Al-nahDah Al-Arabiyah.

Barbiers, S. (2009). ‘Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation’. Lingua, 119(11), 1607-1623.

Barbiers, S. (2013). ‘Where is syntactic variation’. Language Variation-European Perspectives IV, 14, 1-26.

Barbiers, S., Koeneman, O., and Lekakou, M. (2010). ‘Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh chains’. Journal of Linguistics, 46(1), 1-46.

Boef, E. (2013). Doubling in relative clauses: Aspects of morphosyntactic microvariation in Dutch. Netherlands: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

Bruening, B. (2014). ‘Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2), 363-422.

Bruening, B. (2018). ‘The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous’. Language, 94(1), 1 42.

Cantarino, V. (1974). Syntax of Modern Arabic Prose (Vol. 1,2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1970). ‘Remarks on nominalization’. In Jacobs, RA and PS Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184-221. Waltham: Ginn.

Chomsky, N. (2001). ‘Derivation by Phase’. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 13-127. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.

Cowan, D. (1958). Modern Literary Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eifan, E. (2017). Grammaticalization in Urban Hijazi Arabic. Unpublished MA Thesis, Manchester.

Feghali, H. (1991). Arabic Hijazi Reader. Wheaton: Dunwoody Press.

Hachem, M. (2015). Multifunctionality: The internal and external syntax of D- and W-Items in German and Dutch. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’. In K. H. a. S. J. Keyser (ed.), The View from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111 176. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hasan, N. A. (2014). ‘Exclamation in English and Arabic: A contrastive study’. International journal of Science Commerce and Humanities, 2(2), 174-198.

Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Ken, H., and Keyser, S. J. (1993). ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations’. Hale & Keyser (eds.), 53-109.

Kreidler, C. W. (2014). Introducing English Semantics. London: Routledge.

Lieber, R. (1988). ‘Phrasal compounds in English and the morphology-syntax interface’. CLs, 24, 398-405.

Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory: University of Chicago Press.

Lieber, R. (2015). Introducing Morphology: Cambridge University Press.

Marantz, A. (1997). ‘No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon’. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, 4(2), 14.

Morris, W. (1969). The American Heritage dictionary of the English language. New York: American Heritage Pub. Co.

Müller, S., and Wechsler, S. (2014). ‘Lexical approaches to argument structure’. Theoretical Linguistics, 40(1-2), 1-76.

Newmeyer, F. (2009). ‘Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis’. Time and Again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics, 91-117.

Opitz, A., Regel, S., Müller, G., and Friederici, A. D. (2013). ‘Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection’. Language, 89(2), 231-264.

Radford, A. (2009). An introduction to English sentence structure. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rammuny, R. M. (1978). ‘Functional and semantic developments in negation as used in modern literary Arabic prose after World War I’. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 37, 245-264.

Ryding, K. C. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology (Vol. 138), John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sieny, M. (1978). The Syntax of Urban Hijazi Arabic. London: Longman.

Wehr, H., and Cowan, J. M. (1979). A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic: Arab.-Engl., (4th ed.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Williams, E. (2007). ‘Dumping lexicalism’. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 353-382.

Wiltschko, M. (2014). The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology (Vol. 142): Cambridge University Press.